MSNBC’s O’Donnell connects with Olbermann’s audience

Washington Post
Bill O’Reilly outdraws Lawrence O’Donnell by roughly 3 to 1 each night — just as he regularly trounced Keith Olbermann. “Nevertheless, O’Donnell has largely retained Olbermann’s million-plus nightly viewers, a tactical victory for MSNBC,” writes Paul Farhi. “O’Donnell sounds almost as surprised as anyone by this turn of events.”

I’m here for one simple reason. I subbed for Keith and the ratings did not go down. No one can explain to me how the ratings stayed the same. This is entirely a luck business. [Screenwriter] William Goldman said it best: “No one knows anything.”

O’Donnell tells Farhi he’d like to do more in-depth work with a broader range of topics, but that wouldn’t fly at MSNBC.

If it were up to me, we’d be doing a PBS show. I’m trying to train my show instincts to what works in this environment. There are things that deserve better conversations than we’re capable of having in eight-minute blocks. But a Jim Lehrer show or a Charlie Rose can’t happen here. Mostly, it’s me talking to people who agree with me . . . It’s not ‘Crossfire’ anymore. It turns out what works is op-ed TV, like the op-ed page of a newspaper [rather] than a debate.

> O’Donnell in January: “I barely know what I’m doing; it’s an early experiment”

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Laurence

    Just this week, I negotiated with a sales rep at Comcast/Xfinity to add Current TV for about the same price as I’m paying for cable now without Current.  So even though my name is a variant spelling of his first name and my surname is of Irish origin, when June 20th arrives, I’m ready for Keith.  Of course I have a DVR, but since I’ll remain with Rachel too (unless she decamps to Current; could happen), I can only devote two hours to libtalk TV.