Why didn’t New Yorker’s ‘Getting Bin Laden’ story mention explicitly that no SEALs were interviewed?

Women’s Wear Daily
Paul Farhi created some controversy last week when he pointed out that Nicholas Schmidle wasn’t able to interview any of the 23 Navy SEALs involved in the raid on Osama bin Laden’s hideout for his “Getting Bin Laden” story in the New Yorker. “Instead, he said, he relied on the accounts of others who had debriefed the men,” wrote Farhi. “But a casual reader of the article wouldn’t know that.” Zeke Turner reports some bloggers now claim the piece is too detailed to be accurate — something that journalist Andrew Rice rejects. “As someone who occasionally does narrative journalism, and knows exactly how hard it is to weave together an account like this, I’m pretty offended,” he says. Turner writes:

It is a reasonable question why the story doesn’t mention explicitly that no SEALs were interviewed. “You have to follow some kind of rules for your readers so your readers can make judgments about the credibility and the authority of what you’re writing about,” said one investigative reporter, who requested anonymity. “This was beyond fuzzy.”

> Watch Schmidle discuss the piece on last Thursday’s “Charlie Rose”

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Bell/100001788867831 Mike Bell

    Dear Jim,

    Not only did Nicholas Schmidle not interview any SEALs involved in the raid, but he clearly misstated and omitted many details of the operaiton. His background also suggests that he’s somehow connected to the CIA and might be on their payroll as well. He basically created a legend about this operation and covered up the real story about what CIA new and when they knew it.

    John Young has all the details and has exposed Schmidle’s connections and omissions: 


    Extremely interesting read.