Weymouth explains Washington Post bureau closures: We want reporters on the streets

Last week The Washington Post announced that it would close all of its regional bureaus other than those in the state capitals of Annapolis, Md., and Richmond, Va. At the Knight-Batten Awards symposium on Wednesday, Publisher Katharine Weymouth answered a question about the decision:

We’re really not closing our bureaus, we’re closing down the literal office space, because … it doesn’t really matter where your office is. We don’t really want them [reporters] in the office, we want them out on the street talking to people. So our local coverage is as important to us as it has ever been. … but we thought we could do that smarter and better by having people in the street.

Weymouth also talked about citizen journalism and social media, including her belief that 9/11 would have been more traumatic if social media existed then. “Can you imagine how horrifying it would have been if we had tweets from the victims on the planes or in the offices, or if they had posted to their Facebook pages?” || Related: Would the Graham family sell The Washington Post if it continues to lose money? Don Graham says, “No. That is spelled n-o.”

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/FlaFan FlaFan

    She may have the same first name, but she didn’t inherit her grandmother’s wisdom.

  • Edwin Allen

    Is she gonna give reporters umbrellas so that they can file from some park bench? Her remarks insult the intelligence of WaPo readers. 

  • Anonymous

    based on this explanation, the post could sell it’s headquarters offices and relocate to more modest digs. it would help get reporters on the streets — presuming many of them haven’t been “on the street” up to now.