Should news sites with limited resources depend on user-generated content?

CNN’s recent announcement that it had laid off 50 employees came just before the cable network announced that it had redesigned its iReport site, which features citizen journalists’ content.

Earlier this week, Stephen Colbert poked fun at the connection between the layoffs and iReport, saying: “Why buy the cow when you can have it shakily videotape its own milk for free?”

This was a joke, of course, but it speaks to some important questions: How are news sites striking a balance, if at all, between user-generated content and staffers’ content? Should they even try to strike a balance? Does it make sense for some news sites to rely more on user-generated content when faced with limited resources?

Reuters’ Jack Shafer and Eugenia Chien, who helps run the user-generated site Muni Diaries, addressed these questions in a live chat, which you can replay here:

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Iris Xinzil

    I don’t think it being a joke makes it not a valid point. Something can be valid and humorous, they are not mutually exclusive. 

    It is a bad problem getting worse, as the news networks became more about profit and less about giving a clear view of reality they have devolved. There is very little actual journalism anymore, just uninformed opinions, punditry and morbid idolism. This is a further step to turn news into America’s funniest home videos. 

    It’s embarrassing and only hurts our culture. Unfortunately people don’t even recognize the problem and its not recent.