Is Roland Martin controversy a symptom of the contributors CNN chooses?

Dylan Byers notes that criticism of Roland Martin for a comment he made about a Super Bowl commercial — “If a dude at your Super Bowl party is hyped about David Beckham’s H&M underwear ad, smack the ish out of him!” — marks the third time this year that CNN contributors have caused some kind of controversy. The fact that CNN keeps finding itself in this position, he writes, says something about its editorial strategy:

CNN has aimed to position itself in the center of an increasingly partisan media landscape, between the right-leaning Fox News and the left-leaning MSNBC. But rather than build up a team of independent or moderate analysts to reflect that effort, the network opted to expand its collection of partisan analysts — including Loesch, Erickson, and Martin — in both directions, likely believing that they could achieve balance by tipping both sides of the scale. …

The result is not nonpartisan programming, but bipartisan programming — and bipartisan in the current sense of the word, which is to say that it rarely yields a constructive consensus.

Related: Newsweek’s Rebecca Dana looks at the touchy situation between Current TV and Keith Olbermann, saying former Vice President Al Gore “found himself prostrate before his celebrity anchor, begging him not to go.”

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Barry Hollander

    CNN is sliding down that slippery slope and looking more and more like its thankfully defunct program, Crossfire.  I’m not sure what the answer is (opinion rather than reporting, like its cable competitors?), but this formula ain’t working.

  • Chegg Coupons

    He is pretty fair, but definately has an Obama slant. However, he is not nearly as biased as the guy who is the Hillary Supporter. He is in denial every single time I see him on TV.

  • Anonymous

    Of course, CNN has for years now been paying buffoons to spout opinions rather than paying reporters to report the news. How many no-name, talented journalists could be hired with the money that’s going to Martin, Erickson, etc.?

    As bad as Martin’s tweet was, his cringe-inducing-but-hilarious attempts to lie his way out of it are much worse. But much worse than either is this 2006 item, where he extols the virtues of praying the gay away: