Briggs’ project, in addition to an analysis published on Poynter, “throw a lot of attention at the Times, implying that it should be held to a higher standard than other publications,” Dries writes.
While that’s not the case, it makes sense that it’s being targeted. It’s a notably liberal publication, which means that it should hypothetically be more sensitive to issues of equal representation and diversity.
“My goals for the project range from the very practical to the more esoteric,” Briggs told Nicholas Jackson.
On the one hand, greater transparency of the bias on our nation’s most prized newspaper’s homepage could be corrected very quickly—anybody reading this site could very easily name a dozen or two talented female journalists at the Times that aren’t being rewarded with homepage slots—and Who Writes For would register that shift immediately. On the other, Briggs hopes to encourage a more esoteric discussion about the decisions taking place without our complete awareness that inform who we are and what we do. “There are systems in place that affect what we do, what we read, what we watch,” Briggs told me, “and I think we have a responsibility to interrogate those systems.”