Tampa Bay Times plans buyouts in advance of job reductions

The Tampa Bay Times will announce Wednesday it plans to offer buyouts to employees, according to a memo from Human Resources Director Sebastian Dortch. Staffers who take them will get up to 13 weeks’ severance plus two weeks’ pay. The buyouts precede planned “job reductions around the company,” Dortch writes.

“We are finding some ways to improve our results without compromising our quality. We want to support the colleagues whose jobs will be affected,” Tampa Bay Times Communications Director Jounice Nealy-Brown says in an email to Poynter.

Here’s the memo:

As many of you know, we are working with the advice of business consultants to improve the company’s financial results, and we are encouraged by the early findings.

While some details are still being determined, it is clear that this work will result in some job reductions around the company.

Before they begin, we will offer an enhancement to staffers (fulltime and grandfathered 1,000-hour part time) who would like to leave the Times on their own accord. In these voluntary resignations, we will pay up to 13 weeks severance, depending on years of service, along with an two additional weeks of pay.

We will make this offer available from March 10 to 24. If you are interested, please talk to your manager or your department’s Human Resources representative about next steps, including determining a departure date.

Even if you are not interested, this is an opportunity to take stock of your place in the Times‘ future. Your manager can help, as well as HR. This is an important time to understand where you stand.

Poynter owns the Tampa Bay Times.

Last Friday, Jim Romenesko reported that a commenter on SportsJournalists.com claimed the Tampa Bay Times planned to shed 10 percent of its workforce, and that the paper’s “copy desk will be hit the hardest.” Times Publishing Company Chairman and CEO Paul Tash did not reply to a query from a Poynter reporter Friday.

The next day The Tampa Tribune, which competes with the Tampa Bay Times, published a piece by Richard Mullins that described the Times as a “shrinking company under increasing financial strain.”

Revenue at the Times and its sister publications is half what it was five years ago, and the paper has been selling assets around the region. More recently, the newspaper took out a $28 million loan, backed by its headquarters and other property — due in December 2016.

A separate article noted that Poynter’s “expenses still outweighed revenues by $1.7 million in 2012, according to tax filings.”

Tash sent a memo to employees on March 1 saying the company would “defer some contributions to our pension plan.”

The Times did a round of layoffs in 2011 and extended pay cuts for staff in 2012, a reduction that ended a few months later. It instituted a paywall last year, asking “readers who turn most often to our website to help support it financially.”

In September 2013, the Times had an average circulation of 355,853 on Sundays, down about 6 percent from the year before, according to figures filed with the Alliance for Audited Media. Its average Monday-Friday circulation fell about 4 percent.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Sinclair Upps

    The incredible thing is that the Times hasn’t written about its serious financial problems, which undoubtedly stem from extraordinarily bad management. Where’s the Poynter “ethicist” on that? The fact that the Times’ lender, Crystal Financial, has had to send in management consultants is a sure sign the boat is sinking. The Times’ attempt to conceal its problems is the ultimate hypocrisy for a news organization. And, Tash is buying a much more expensive condo than his previous home — while he is firing battalions of journalists. All we need is for the ghost of Nelson Poynter to appear and denounce Tash for the murder most foul of the newspaper.

  • markisenberg

    There is more than one reason why the Tampa Bay Times is a much better paper than the other local one I used to subscribe to but gave up on and not because of its editorial opinions. All papers struggle.The NY Times borrowed $200 million from Carlos Sim a few years ago but the Times is in a league of its own so its future is secure in one form or some other. The Times has to raise funds from subscribers,advertisers etc. It is trying with the digital paywall and it is a work in progress but the new President of the Institute was hired for his fundraising skills. A new limited round of layoffs is sad but if the President and Mr. Tash who already has taken out a short term loan,can’t boost income by the end of 2015,the future could be even darker than it has been for the Tribune,a once proud competitor now just hobbling along with a new,not very serious owner who wanted to buy the Boston Globe but was thwarted by Times Publisher Mr. Sulzberger Jr. after I clued him in to what the Tribune is failing to do on a daily basis here. I am a small NY Times shareholder who grew up reading it and kind of likes the idea of quality writing and investigative reporting. Those of you who do not like the TB Times are having a chuckle but I have a feeling it will rebound although that is little comfort for those about to take a buyout or suffer a layoff,again.

  • melitagnm105

    my Aunty Sienna recently got a stunning red Nissan Maxima by
    working part time online… find out here now B­u­z­z­3­4­.­ℂ­o­m

  • JTFloore

    “We are finding some ways to improve our results without compromising our quality.”

    doubtless yet another example of “doing more with less.” ya know, there was a time when newspapers insisted that their young reporters not fall for such horsehit statements. now the media are the most guilty of such balderdash.

  • Peter Schorsch

    More evidence of just how well that name change worked out.