Articles about "Copyright and fair use"


NYT: Scroll Kit developer ‘is bragging’ about copyright infringement

Cody Brown | TechCrunch
Cody Brown received a takedown request from The New York Times' legal department after he posted a video showing how to replicate the "Snow Fall" experience using his tool Scroll Kit.

After he answered that request, Deborah Beshaw-Farrell of the legal department asked him to remove some crowing language from Scroll Kit's site:
It took The New York Times hundreds of hours to hand code "Snow Fall." ...we made a replica in an hour.
(more...)
Tools:
0 Comments

Publications can no longer send photographers to Beyoncé shows

Fstoppers | Music Photographers
Beyoncé won't allow publications to send their own photographers to concerts on her Mrs. Carter tour. Publications wishing to illustrate coverage of the tour will have to download photos from an approved site, Noam Galai reports.

Beyoncé's publicist Yvette Noel-Schure emailed BuzzFeed after it ran photos of the singer at the Super Bowl halftime show that Noel-Schure called "unflattering." BuzzFeed turned the email and photos into a piece called "The 'Unflattering' Photos Beyoncé's Publicist Doesn't Want You To See."

The no-photographers edict represents an escalation in the struggle between music artists, photographers and the publications that employ the latter. (more...)
Tools:
6 Comments

U.K. court: Meltwater doesn’t violate copyright

The Guardian | Politico
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled Wednesday that the news aggregator Meltwater does not violate copyright laws by storing a cached page on app users’ mobile devices and laptops. The court sent the case to the European Court of Justice to ensure that subsequent rulings are consistent across European jurisdictions. (more...)
Tools:
0 Comments

Shepard Fairey gets probation for actions in AP photo case

Associated Press
A New York judge has sentenced artist Shepard Fairey to two years of probation and 300 hours of community service for lying and destroying evidence relevant to the Associated Press' complaint that he'd used one of its images of Barack Obama as the basis for his iconic "HOPE" poster. Fairey admitted in 2009 he'd "submitted false images and deleted others in the legal proceedings." He pleaded guilty to criminal contempt in February.

The government had argued Fairey should get jail time; Fairey's attorneys argued his offenses were misdemeanors. The AP sounds glad to have this all over and done with:

"After spending a great amount of time, energy and legal effort, all of us at The Associated Press are glad this matter is finally behind us," AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt said in a statement. "We hope this case will serve as a clear reminder to all of the importance of fair compensation for those who gather and produce original news content."
Tools:
0 Comments

Portland Press Herald to pay woman for using photograph without permission

The Portland Press Herald will pay a woman $400 for publishing a photograph from her Flickr account after she complained that she hadn't given permission or been contacted beforehand.

The newspaper came under fire for using the photograph (in print and online) in connection with a story about how a local university had allowed a chaplain to return to campus after he had been accused of sexual abuse.

The paper then published an explanation of why it ran the photo, but later deleted the post. In its explanation, the newspaper said a reporter had tried to reach Audrey Ann Slade, but when he was unsuccessful, editors decided that they could legally publish the image under fair use.

Slade wrote on her blog that she was "floored" by the paper's failure to reach her:
No attempt to contact me. No attempt to credit me. Just taking something I did and with no care or regard, dragged something I did to be kind into a sordid and disgusting story. With not so much as a heads up. ... (more...)
Tools:
3 Comments

Study: Journalists’ lousy understanding of fair use leads to self-censorship

Social Science Research Network
Few journalists understand the rules of fair use, but they often successfully fake their way through the issues it raises. That's one takeaway from "Copyright, Free Speech, and the Public's Right to Know: How Journalists Think About Fair Use," a study by Patricia Aufderheide, Peter Jaszi, Katie Bieze and Jan Lauren Boyles, who interviewed 80 journalists and compared their often-comical understanding of legal matters to reality.

Among their findings, people who work in newsrooms had the advantage of colleagues they could consult:
Interviewees who work within institutions had confidence that their editors had established a newsroom practice that they could comfortably follow. Journalists also referred often to “common sense,” or as one put it, “You just know in general you shouldn’t park too close to a hydrant.” Through this process, most journalists acquire baseline knowledge of fair use, often without realizing they are even relying on it. Those who lack newsroom support often display less confidence.
Amazingly, they often got it right:
Interviewees demonstrated a robust confidence in their ability to access other people’s copyrighted material without permission or payment, in some situations, typically without knowing they were employing fair use. Further, when they employed fair use without identifying it as such, they often accurately used the reigning logic of the doctrine -- transformative purpose and appropriate amount.
Photo editors were more sensitive to copyright concerns than others, maybe because so many of the people they work with get their stuff stolen all the time. (more...)
Tools:
3 Comments

Slate writer: BuzzFeed pillages Reddit for its viral photo posts

Slate | Pbump.net
Farhad Manjoo writes:
How does this one site come up with so many simple ideas that people want to spread far and wide? What’s their secret?

The answer, in short, is that BuzzFeed’s staff finds stuff elsewhere on the Web, most often at Reddit. They polish and repackage what they find. And often—and, from what I can tell, deliberately—their posts are hard to trace back to the original source material.

... Once you understand how central Reddit is to BuzzFeed, it’s like spotting the wizard behind the curtain. Whenever you see a popular BuzzFeed post, search Reddit, and all will be revealed.
It's not the first time BuzzFeed has taken heat for republishing other people's photos in lists like “33 Animals Who Are Extremely Disappointed in You.” Manjoo said BuzzFeed founder Jonah Peretti "concedes that some of its ideas have appeared elsewhere online, but he argued that there’s nothing wrong with that because few things on the Web are really original."

Grist writer Philip Bump, writing on his personal blog, evaluates Manjoo's case against BuzzFeed:
Where Manjoo's post hits hardest, I think, is when it suggests that BuzzFeed steals ideas. ... (more...)
Tools:
0 Comments

If putting photos together in a top 10 list is fair use, what isn’t?

The Atlantic | Slate
Tuesday, The Atlantic's Alexis Madrigal wrote that BuzzFeed co-founder Jonah Peretti believes BuzzFeed can legally republish others' photos in thematic packages such as "33 Animals Who Are Extremely Disappointed in You."
So, Peretti told me that he considers a BuzzFeed list -- its sequencing, framing, etc -- to be a transformative use of photos. That is to say, including that unattributed photo of the otter in that list was OK because its inclusion as an "extremely disappointed" animal transformed the nature of the photo.

"It's a question," Peretti said, "of when lots of little things add up to a transformation as opposed to a copyright violation."
A law professor tells Slate's Jeremy Stahl, however, that he wouldn't expect that to hold up in court.
Adding a funny caption, however, has not been viewed as transformative. “I would expect an interesting response from a judge if I argued that putting a caption on a photo was transformative use for the purposes of fair use,” says UVA professor, copyright expert, and occasional Slate contributor Thomas Nachbar.
(more...)
Tools:
2 Comments

Meltwater says AP’s copyright lawsuit threatens all search engines

Meltwater has filed a response to the Associated Press' copyright lawsuit by saying that it's simply a sophisticated Internet search engine, and it hasn't violated copyright law by indexing AP stories.

In its copyright infringement lawsuit, AP called Meltwater a "modern-day clipping service." For $5,000 a year, Meltwater enables clients to search news stories for mentions of keywords and to receive email digests that contain portions of relevant news stories. AP contends Meltwater is undercutting its business by providing its content without paying AP for it.

Meltwater's defense is important, as Nieman Journalism Lab's Justin Ellis reported, because courts have treated search engines and clipping services differently in regard to copyright law.

By attacking a search engine, Meltwater contends, AP "challenges one of the core functions of the Internet." (more...)
Tools:
1 Comment

Pinterest’s new terms make way for private sharing, API

Pinterest | Forbes
Pinterest has updated the legal policies governing its service. The terms lay groundwork for new features: private pinboards and an API. They also set strict rules against copyright violations and clarify that Pinterest will not sell uploaded content. || Related: How The Wall Street Journal uses Pinterest (10,000 Words) | Pinterest drops its "avoid self promotion" directive (The Wall Street Journal) || Earlier: As Pinterest grows visitors 52% in one month, journalism profs find news uses for it (Poynter)
Tools:
1 Comment