Joshua Gillin
May 15, 2013
12:06 pm
The New Yorker |
The Washington Post |
The New York Times |
Wired |
Guardian |
All Things D
The New Yorker on Tuesday introduced its new, anonymous electronic tip tool
Strongbox, coincidentally on the heels of renewed concerns over privacy for journalists' sources following revelations of Department of Justice surveillance of AP staffers (which The Washington Post's Timothy B. Lee notes is
"likely perfectly legal")
The Strongbox site ostensibly allows people to submit letters, documents, emails or any other files to the New Yorker anonymously. It was developed in conjunction with Wired investigations editor Kevin Poulsen and the late Web activist and developer Aaron Swartz, who
hanged himself in January after facing charges of wire fraud and computer fraud. Poulsen, whose publication also is owned by New Yorker parent Conde Nast,
wrote about Swartz's involvement, and why Strongbox was a necessity.
There’s a growing technology gap: phone records, e-mail, computer forensics, and outright hacking are valuable weapons for anyone looking to identify a journalist’s source. With some exceptions, the press has done little to keep pace: our information-security efforts tend to gravitate toward the parts of our infrastructure that accept credit cards.
(more...)
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Al Tompkins
May 7, 2013
3:21 pm
How do you dig up information in a story like the one unfolding in Cleveland when all you know is three women missing for nearly a decade suddenly escaped their captors? When the story broke, government offices were closed, the … Read more
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Joshua Gillin
Apr. 9, 2013
2:51 pm
Le Temps via WorldCrunch | Time
The
resignation last week of French President Francois Hollande's budget minister Jérôme Cahuzac over allegations of tax fraud has been shining a spotlight on one model of online investigative journalism.
Mediapart, a French website founded five years ago by a pair of veteran journalists from newspaper Le Monde, now has another feather in its cap for breaking (and sticking with) the Cahuzac scandal, and has a subscriber base that proves online journalism can work.
Co-founders Laurent Mauduit and Edwy Plenel are celebrating the latest victory for Mediapart, which first gained fame for exposing Nicolas Sarkozy's campaign finance scandal in 2010. Both during that investigation and the Cahuzac story, politicians, readers and other members of the media questioned the site's allegations.
"Not only did Cahuzac lie but we were also belittled by our colleagues, who told us this was nonsense,” Mauduit
told Time's Vivienne Walt. French
National Center for Scientific Research sociologist and media specialist Jean-Marie Charon notes that skepticism is a product of French culture, which largely mistrusts the media.
(more...)
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Andrew Beaujon
Mar. 1, 2013
10:18 am
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Steve Myers
Aug. 9, 2012
4:20 pm
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Andrew Beaujon
June 19, 2012
11:48 am
Gawker |
Philly.com |
BBC News |
The Daily Beast
As
Watergate calcifies into myth, it's inevitable that the Internet would try to break a few bones in return. Writing in Gawker, John Cook grabs his blackjack and starts swinging,
listing nine "crimes against journalism" he says Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein committed in their pursuit of the Watergate story. Among them: revealing a confidential source to his boss, lying, and acquiring phone and financial records. "It's worth noting that Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper holdings are currently burning to the ground over behavior that is barely distinguishable" from Woodward and Bernstein's, Cook writes.
Cook's article takes a fascinating turn into what he sees as their biggest failure: allowing their legacy to become ever more gold-plated as time passes.
But those various sins would likely render any major contemporary journalistic enterprise illegitimate if exposed in the hothouse environment that is Watergate's legacy, largely because they diverge from the attitude of public rectitude that Woodward (not so much Bernstein) continues to represent. It's the one thing Nixon and the right got out of Watergate: They were able to milk the increasingly professionalized and self-regarding press corps for commitments to propriety and ethical forthrightness, ratcheting up the baseline for what "acceptable" journalism is and in the process robbing a new generation of reporters of the tools and reckless swagger to pull off a repeat performance.
Woodward and Bernstein were allowed to be wrong, Cook says, something almost unimaginable for reporters on such a high wire today. "Thanks to the press mavens for whom error is a moral failure, the stink of a mistake is harder to wash off. The audience is less forgiving and more suspicious; one screw-up throws the whole enterprise in doubt." (Incidentally, I recently watched "All the President's Men" again and was surprised at how baldly it portrays Woodstein's and The Washington Post's cross-fingers-and-jump approach toward some of their stories.)
Will Bunch says the pair's biggest problem is "Nixon Exceptionalism" -- the idea,
evinced in a recent Post piece by the reporters, that "Watergate was a brazen and daring assault, led by Nixon himself, against the heart of American democracy: the Constitution, our system of free elections, the rule of law."
(more...)
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Steve Myers
Apr. 23, 2012
4:03 pm
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Andrew Beaujon
Mar. 1, 2012
12:02 pm
WVUE Fox 8
St. Bernard Parish deputies will no longer shoot at photographs of WVUE-TV reporter Lee Zurik at target practice after a television report on the practice. Zurik reported last November about
alleged voter fraud by sheriff's department employees. For two days, WVUE found, deputies practiced their aim using a target festooned with Zurik's photo.
Outgoing St. Bernard Sheriff Jack Stephens, who is
retiring after 28 years on the job, says deputies have been "admonished never to use celebrity portraits again as target practice." He apologized to Zurik on-air. "I hope he accepts the apology of me and the department because there was never any ill-will or threat intended by it," Stephens said.
- Tools:
- Permalink
-
Julie Moos
Feb. 28, 2012
5:24 pm
- Tools:
- Permalink
-