Articles about "The New York Times"


Ad revenue rises at New York Times Co.

The New York Times Company | The New York Times
Advertising and circulation revenue rose at The New York Times Company in the first quarter of 2014. Times Co. CEO Mark Thompson said in an earnings release that while the company is "pleased with this result," it is "certainly not claiming victory in advertising yet." Both digital and print advertising revenue rose, for a combined total that was 3.4 percent higher than the same period in 2013.

The Times' native advertising product, Paid Posts, "launched very successfully" during this quarter, Thompson said.

The company says it now has about 799,000 digital-only subscribers, an increase of 39,000 over the first quarter of 2013. Circulation revenues were up 2.1 percent. It expects circulation revenue "to increase in the low-single digits in the second quarter of 2014" over the same period in 2013.

The company's operating costs went up 3.8 percent, "mainly due to higher compensation and benefits expenses associated with the strategic growth initiatives as well as higher retirement costs," the earnings report says.

Earlier this month the Times introduced two new tiers of subscriptions: A no-frills product, where readers get access to some stories via an app called NYT Now, and a high end one that promises "the highest level of connection with The New York Times." It launched a news startup, The Upshot, this week.

Regarding the new products, Thompson said he is "pleased with the reception thus far and by the continued strength of our core digital subscription packages, which grew by 18% year-over-year in Q1.”

NYT launches ‘The Upshot,’ its data-driven news-explainer thing

The New York Times Company | The Upshot
The Upshot, a new data-driven New York Times publication, launched Tuesday. It aims to help readers "better navigate the news," the Times says in a press release. The site "will focus on politics, policy and economics, with a particular emphasis on the 2014 elections, the state of the economy, economic mobility and health care."

Its staff believes "many people don’t understand the news as well as they would like," Upshot Editor David Leonhardt writes in a welcome note, and those people would like to be able to "explain the whys and hows of those stories to their friends, relatives and colleagues."

The Upshot will rely on data to "illuminate and explain the news," Leonhardt writes, and its first-day stories include a model that projects Democrats' chances to keep control of the U.S. Senate and another that says the United States' middle class is now less wealthy than Canada's.

The Upshot joins a suddenly bustling market of publications that hope to bring context to the news, including Vox ("explaining the news") and FiveThirtyEight ("we hope to contribute to your understanding of the news in a variety of ways").

Previously: NYT names new D.C. bureau chief, plans two ‘newsroom start ups’ | NYT’s Leonhardt: The Upshot staff will ‘serve as navigators for the news’

NYT abides by Israeli gag order, draws questions from public editor

The New York Times
The New York Times delayed publication of a story this week about a young journalist and Palestinian rights advocate held by Israeli authorities, abiding by a court gag order, the Times' public editor wrote Friday.

Jerusalem Bureau Chief Jodi Rudoren told Public Editor Margaret Sullivan that the paper is bound by the gag orders:
She said that the situation is analogous to abiding by traffic rules or any other laws of the land, and that two of her predecessors in the bureau chief position affirmed to her this week that The Times has been subject to gag orders in the past.
The newspaper's newsroom lawyer told Sullivan “the general understanding among legal counsel in other countries is that local law would apply to foreign media,” but said the Times hasn't challenged the restriction in Israel.

Sullivan said holding the story for a few days "may have done no great harm," but she said she found it "troubling" that the Times should have to wait for the government's approval before deciding to run a story.

If the situation is unavoidable, she said, a "little transparency would go a long way" and that the story should include a sentence or two telling readers what is occurring.
1 Comment

On NYT’s front page, a selfie

It's actually the making of a selfie that we see on the front of The New York Times, with a spring scene as the backdrop.

Photos of the making of selfies are down-right common at this point. Poynter's Andrew Beaujon included a few in his March 3 story, including one of John Kerry and students in Indonesia and Justin Bieber and fans in L.A. Of course, Ellen brought attention to the group selfie trend at the Oscars, and photos of that selfie, as well as the selfie itself also made big news.

On April 1, photos of the president posing for a selfie with David Ortiz led to the news that that photo, like the Oscar one, was really a stunt by Samsung.

But at least photojournalists are using their skills to add something to these strange, culturally-relevant moments. Via AP Images, here's a recent sampling of what photographers have done when selfies happen. (more...)
1 Comment
Yellow What the Barrier Tape

AP: ‘Damn’ and ‘hell’ OK, but not most other profanity

Associated Press | The Economist "I’m not sure everyone’s OK with news media keeping up with the latest vulgarities," AP standards editor Tom Kent writes in a post on the suddenly kind of hot topic of whether news organizations should publish profanity. "For instance, if our stories were as laced with things 'sucking' as common speech is, readers might find it very tedious very fast." AP now prints "damn" and "hell" without occasioning any pearl-clutching, Kent notes. And it will usually hyphenate or bleep newsworthy profanity, like when Vice President Biden called the health-care law "a big fucking deal" (a word Kent reproduces in all its glory). So why worry so much, AP?
We believe most AP subscribers — web and mobile news sites, broadcasters and newspapers — still want certain obscenities obscured. It’s also our own opinion that loading up our services with gratuitous obscenities cheapens our work and is of service to no one.
A "newspaper’s job is not to report tasteful news," The Economist's language blog, Johnson, writes in a call for The New York Times to loosen its standards.
True slurs, such as those concerning race, sex and disability, can sear the victim. Yet reporting on the damage done no more repeats the damage than publishing a photograph of a victim of physical harm repeats that harm. It’s called journalism, and it is the New York Times’s sole reason for existence.

On Thursday, Amanda Hess wrote about the media talking down to women. In a piece called “Enough With the Ageist, Sexist Mom Jokes,” Hess wrote about a story in The New York Times on Tuesday and how the act of having a child does not actually lower IQ or the ability to understand complex topics.

I heard about “How to Explain Bitcoin to Your Mom” from my mother, of course, who spotted the item on the Times’ twitter feed. She is a New York Times subscriber (since the audience of the is 52 percent female with a median age of 47, I assume moms are a key demographic for the newspaper), so she is well-aware of the paper’s near-constant coverage of the cryptocurrency, even though these articles are written using grown-up words and not pretty pictures. (The same cannot be said for my father: When I called and asked him “What is Bitcoin?,” he replied, “I’ve been asking everybody the same thing for months.”)

Amanda Hess, Slate


NYT Now app offers trendy mobile design and human-powered aggregation — for iPhone only

NYT Now, the new iOS app from The New York Times that’s free for digital subscribers and $8 per month otherwise if you want to read more than 10 articles, is live in the App Store.… Read more

Screen Shot 2014-03-31 at 10.54.36 AM

On profanity: As language evolves, should the media?

The New York Times | The Wall Street Journal
On Sunday, Jesse Sheidlower wrote an op-ed piece for The New York Times making "The Case for Profanity in Print."
Our society’s comfort level with offensive language and content has drastically shifted over the past few decades, but the stance of our news media has barely changed at all. Even when certain words are necessary to the understanding of a story, the media frequently resort to euphemisms or coy acrobatics that make stories read as if they were time capsules written decades ago, forcing us all into wink-wink-nudge-nudge territory. Even in this essay, I am unable to be clear about many of my examples.
Sheidlower, author of “The F-Word” and president of the American Dialect Society, wrote that often the words themselves are the story, and other times, they're integral to the story itself.

On Sunday, The Wall Street Journal's "Style & Substance" covered the same issue, in part. The piece refers to a March 7 story which included the word "ass." In the past, the story reports, that word would have been a--.
What has changed? Standards Editor Neal Lipschutz says the change is slight. Use of impolite words should still be rare, but there are certain words that we’ll publish now that we wouldn’t have used a decade ago. There still has to be a compelling reason to use the quotation, including demonstrating insight into someone’s character by his or her word choices, but there are times when ass, jackass or yes, suck, may be allowed to appear, in cases where they might have been “Barney-dashed” before.

The reasoning is that we want to be classy without being Victorian, in line with the evolving language. “We still want to be tasteful, but we also want to as much as possible reflect how people speak in this era,” Neal says.
I stopped by the office of my colleague, Roy Peter Clark, Monday morning to talk about these articles and the roll of "bad" words. Clark stood up, walked to a tall book shelf and pulled down his copy of Sheidlower's "The F-Word."

In many ways, some words that used to offend don't do so any more, he told me, and new ones rise to take their place. (more...)

NYT public editor takes off again after anonymous sources

The New York Times
In the second installment of AnonyWatch, New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan turns a sharp eye on the continuing use of anonymous sources in the Times and elsewhere.

She scrutinizes and challenges the use of unnamed sources in reporting on topics large and small, but specifies she is after the kinds of examples that give people a free pass to make "gratuitous anonymous quotations, the kind that allow people to speculate, offer personal criticism or get a self-serving (often political) message out without taking any responsibility for it."

After hearing from the editors responsible for stories in which anonymous quotes appeared, she sometimes concludes a good case has been made for anonymity; in others, she's not so sure. (more...)
1 Comment

SND names ‘World’s Best’ news sites and apps, criticizes design stagnation

Society for News Design

The Society for News Design has recognized websites from The New York Times and Nautilus and iPhone apps from WNYC and Al Jazeera America as 2013 World's Best-Designed winners.

The judges seemed to prefer experiences that were carefully tailored to specific devices: "Native apps, iOS, Android and others that rose to the level of excellence for us were purposefully appropriate in their medium." (more...)
1 Comment