May 15, 2020

PolitiFact and MediaWise are teaming up to debunk misinformation about the coronavirus crisis. To have Coronavirus Facts delivered to your inbox Monday-Friday, click here.

I wish I could say I’m having a happy Friday, but I have more friends sharing bad coronavirus information. It’s starting to get old.

Speaking of old — here’s what I’m talking about: On May 9, a YouTube channel called Voice of the Majority uploaded a clip of Dr. Anthony Fauci telling CBS News chief medical correspondent Dr. Jonathan LaPook that there’s no reason people in the U.S. should wear a mask. One glaring problem: the clip is from a March interview.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in early April updated its guidelines to recommend Americans wear masks in public.

Voice of the Majority has only posted 23 videos and has 1,400 followers, but the out-of-context video, titled “Dr. Fauci now says no masks,” has racked up more than 510,000 views — double the amount it had Thursday. And Google search interest in “60 minutes Fauci masks” hit its peak earlier this week.

Posts referencing the YouTube URL have garnered more than 270,000 reactions, including nearly 40,000 shares, according to CrowdTangle data. I first noticed the video in my Facebook newsfeed, and it appears to be following the same pipeline I noted about “Plandemic” in my Monday newsletter.

Yesterday, users in Facebook groups with names like “OFFICIAL Q / QANON,” “Collective Action Against Bill Gates” and “Independent Thinkers of South Africa” — all public groups — shared the video. But the bulk of interaction appears to be in private groups.

I couldn’t glean much about who uploaded the old clip to YouTube. But following the URL in the user’s email address, I found what appeared to be a Facebook-like social network with this introduction: “You have found a Social Media Community of Amazing People Who Share Your Conservative Values.”

I emailed Voice of the Majority for comment but haven’t heard back.

The bottom line: Make sure you do some research on COVID-19 videos before sharing them, because you can’t always trust the YouTube timestamp. And if you’re out in public, please wear a mask.

Can you see the Himalayas for the first time in 30 years?

Increased visibility due to COVID-19 restrictions has allowed people in northern India to see the Himalayas. But there’s no evidence it’s the first time in three decades. MediaWise rates this mostly legit. Watch the fact-check»

Sen. Chris Murphy claims 400,000 traveled from China after Trump restrictions

The number of people that flew directly in from China after Trump’s travel restrictions went into effect was reported in April to be around 40,000, not 400,000. Read the fact-check»

Is the U.S. expected to borrow heavily from China to pay for the COVID-19 stimulus?

Experts say the Federal Reserve is likely to be the largest source of funds for the $3 trillion. China is expected to buy little, if any, of the debt, because it does not have the money to lend. Get the facts»

Facebook post claims stay-at-home orders are illegal and can be disregarded with impunity

The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the rights of a citizen can be restricted by the state for the “common good” during a health crisis. Read more»

Editor’s Note:

Disclosure:, the charitable arm of Google, supports the MediaWise project with grant funding and Google is the parent company of YouTube. Facebook also supports MediaWise and its MediaWise Voter Project. MediaWise operates editorially independent of its funders like all work of The Poynter Institute (details here). More info about MediaWise can be found at

Click here to get this newsletter in your inbox every weekday.

Alex Mahadevan is a senior multimedia reporter at MediaWise. He can be reached at or on Twitter at @AlexMahadevan. Follow MediaWise on TikTok.

Support high-integrity, independent journalism that serves democracy. Make a gift to Poynter today. The Poynter Institute is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, and your gift helps us make good journalism better.
Alex Mahadevan is director of MediaWise at the Poynter Institute. He has taught digital media literacy to thousands of middle and high schoolers, and has…
Alex Mahadevan

More News

Back to News


Comments are closed.

  • Why is it a glaring problem that Dr. Fauci said this in March? He literally stated that it’s not necessary to wear a mask during a pandemic. He said it may block a droplet or two but only gives people a false sense of safety. This is (supposedly) the top expert on all things pandemic. If that’s what he believes, then the better question would be “Why did the CDC change the guidelines?” Your argument clearly makes no sense and I can’t believe you think the time stamp is relevant after hearing the content of the statement.

    • I totally agree. Who cares about the date unless it’s from when he was in grade school. A Dr. with his supposed expertise on pandemics should know that masks help to keep you from spreading the virus and help to keep you from getting it. Especially an N95 respirator mask. I’ve used these in my garage while working on different things and they work very well. My glasses get fogged up from time to time, but I don’t inhale things I’m not supposed to inhale, so I don’t mind the fog.

  • I’m not sure how the clip in your opinion being outdated means out of context. They are two different things. Out of context means Dr. Fauci meant something other than the meaning meant to be taken by the originator of the clip. I don’t see that. If you want to call it outdated in light of recent events that might be arguable but it is not out of context. Viewing the entire interview referenced in full context yields no other interpretation other than Dr. Fauci at that time did not believe masks were at all effective. Perhaps he changed his mind in a matter of weeks but playing devil’s advocate that may very well be the point at issue. Regardless it is not out of context.

  • I am all for wearing masks, and I like Dr. Fauci.I don’t believe in, ” Plandemic,” or some conspiracy, and I am liberal. That being said, to not wear a mask seems to have been terrible advice from the WHO, CDC, and also from him, also in early March. It was lacking in common sense! Think of the lives that could have been saved with better advice back then! We had no way of knowing if we were infected or not without DAILY testing, etc. Even then, you can get tested and be negative, walk out the door and get sneezed on or whatever, and get the virus! To me, that should have meant for everyone should get masks as soon as possible. I was already thinking that in early March, as it seemed pretty darn clear to critical thinkers. The Chinese were already all mainly wearing masks and had learned at that point. Common sense should have dictated caution and the possibility of people being a-symptomatic carriers, even in early March, accepting that even though barriers may not be 100% effective, they certainly could help or couldn’t hurt. Sneezes and coughing clearly spread droplets. Why shouldn’t everyone wear a barrier mask? Why has that just been discovered since March in the long history of the world of scientific research? Why are the people who are supposed to know better, simply not knowing better? I mean, many KNOWN illnesses have an incubation time. The advice should have been given for everyone wear some sort of mask or scarf or something over their mouth and noses, please, just to be safe.

  • Who cares if the clip is from March…he still said what he said, that masks do not prevent the spread of a virus in public. He said that wearing a mask does not protect against infection or prevent you from spreading. You people. SMH