FoxNews.com | Washington Post
Greta Van Susteren says her colleague “should be subjected to scrutiny and to the same rules and vigorous scrutiny as other politicians,” but if a news outlet “is seen as having a bad motive — ie on a mission to destroy someone rather than trying to assemble noteworthy information and report — it is not journalism but something else.” She asks her GretaWire readers about the New York Times and Washington Post “hiring help” to go through Sarah Palin‘s emails. Her poll results: 3.26 percent say that’s “good journalism,” and 96.74 percent call it a “media colonoscopy.” || Post ombud Patrick Pexton says he heard from people who accused the paper “ganging up” on Palin. “These tactics are never used to uncover dirt on the left, it is always attempted to find dirt on the right,” one person complained. || Anchorage Daily News: Here’s our plan for the Palin emails.
> Lawyer predicts that “after all this commotion, it will be a bunch of nothing”
Uncategorized
Van Susteren: Is Palin getting a ‘media colonoscopy’?
More News
Q&A: Jane Lytvynenko on disinformation and how journalists can navigate an increasingly cloudy social media landscape
The pioneering reporter in the disinformation space will host a webinar about investigating Telegram on April 4.
March 28, 2024
What’s next for Plandemic? A musical.
‘It was a good reminder that there is a very strong amount of financial support for even the wackiest far-right, anti-vax ideas’
March 28, 2024
Opinion | Now NBC News must deal with the Ronna McDaniel fallout
Questions linger about whether this could impact how viewers see NBC News’ political coverage
March 28, 2024
Opinion | How fact-checkers can use AI wisely
AI is already saving hundreds of hours of work by automating repetitive tasks. More collaboration among fact-checkers is the next step.
March 28, 2024
Opinion | Yes, you can fact-check on TikTok
Fact-checkers in Turkey have found a space amidst dance videos and humor
March 28, 2024
Comments are closed.
Comments