Cannibalizing Print

June 23, 2003
Category: Uncategorized

Newspaper websites are beginning to cause some cannibalization of print editions, according to Belden Associates’ Spring 2003 survey of newspaper website users. Although Belden’s earlier quarterly surveys had reported that newspaper sites had no net affect on print subscriptions and had slightly increased single-copy sales, the latest survey reports net losses.

Surveying 8,801 newspaper website users, Belden found that 4 percent started a print subscription but another 6 percent stopped subscriptions, and among those who’ve never subscribed, 8 percent are buying more single copies in print, but 12 percent are buying less. When Belden counted only the users who live within the newspapers’ local markets, the net losses were a bit larger: 5 percent started subscriptions, but another 8 percent stopped. Two percent of single-copy buyers bought more, but 6 percent bought less.

Moreover, Belden found that users who do read a print edition, either by subscription or single-copy purchase, read much less frequently: 6 percent read more frequently, but another 20 percent read less (among in-market readers, 7 percent read more and 26 percent read less).

“Data do indicate that we may be beginning to see a shift in behaviors, and that this shift is toward a negative impact on circulation among website users,” said Greg Harmon of Belden Interactive. “Several factors may be in play here. In particular, sites are doing a better job of delivering the news over the web, and visitors are doing a better job of getting what they want from newspaper sites. Here we may be seeing that visitors are coming to ‘trust’ that what they see on the web is what they will see in the newspaper.”

Harmon cautioned that newspaper sites need to know what their own particular situation is in regard to the impact of site use on print user behaviors and need to balance the benefits of their online audience against any negative impact on print circulation.