April 19, 2022

Covering COVID-19 is a daily Poynter briefing of story ideas about the coronavirus and other timely topics for journalists, written by senior faculty Al Tompkins. Sign up here to have it delivered to your inbox every weekday morning.

U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle of the Middle District of Florida ruled Monday that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not have the authority to enforce a mask mandate that is currently set to expire May 3. (Read the ruling here.)

(Monday’s ruling by Judge Mizelle)

On Monday night, news organizations quoted “a Biden administration official” as saying the Transportation Security Administration would not enforce the CDC’s mandate as government agencies review potential next steps, including an appeal that could include a halt on the judge’s ruling. The official, who spoke on background, said the White House is trying to balance the unpopular mandate with a rise of new COVID-19 cases.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the White House’s view is still that people should wear masks on airplanes and that the ruling was “disappointing.”

The mandate has been in effect since February 2021, a couple of weeks after President Joe Biden took office, and has been under fire from many sides. 21 states have sued to end the mask requirement and all 50 states have ended their indoor mask mandates.

10 airlines, including the biggest ones (Delta, United, American), sent a letter to President Biden asking him to sunset the mandate as spring travel sends 2 million fliers a day to the boarding gates.

The Health Freedom Defense Fund filed the lawsuit, which argued that the mandate violated the Administrative Procedures Act. The other plaintiffs included Ana Carolina Daza, who said she suffered from anxiety that is aggravated by wearing masks.

This is the third significant ruling against Biden-era COVID-19 directives that would have required employers to test or require vaccinations for employees, shut down the cruise ship industry and prohibited landlords from evicting non-paying tenants. In those cases and in this one, the courts ruled that the CDC exceeded its authority and, if Congress wants the CDC to have that power, it should pass specific legislation saying so.

This is the section of the Public Health Services Act of 1944 that the CDC relies on to enforce all of its mandates:

(Public Health Services Act 1944)

Judge Mizelle dissected it, as other judges must reason whether it allows the CDC to require masks, prohibit evictions and so on.

The judge’s ruling focuses on the second sentence and finds that the CDC may enforce regulations for inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, destruction of animals or articles found to be so infected or contaminated as to be sources of dangerous infection to human beings and other measures. The judge reads that to mean the only “other measures” that the CDC may take must have to do with fumigation, disinfection and other actions mentioned in that sentence.

The government said its mask mandate power comes from a word in the second sentence: “sanitation.” But the judge said the 1944 understanding of sanitation would have to do with cleansing, which would not apply in this case. “Wearing a mask cleans nothing. At most, it traps virus droplets. But it neither ‘sanitizes’ the person wearing the mask nor ‘sanitizes’ the conveyance,” Judge Mizelle ruled.

More importantly, the judge said, sanitation is a word that refers to “property,” not individuals.

The judge did say the CDC has the authority to “directly regulate” people who are “reasonably believed to be infected with a communicable disease in a qualifying stage.”

Usually, the Administrative Procedures Act requires the government to set aside time for public comment, but the Biden administration said in a pandemic there was no time for that, and it could be “contrary to public health.” The judge wrote that the CDC should have provided evidence that there was an urgency behind its order. She pointed out that at the time the CDC began the order, the pandemic had been unfolding for more than a year and cases, for the moment, were declining.

BuzzFeed News points out these details about the judge:

Mizelle was 33 when she became the youngest person successfully appointed by former president Donald Trump to the federal bench in November 2020. The American Bar Association had advised that she was “not qualified” for the lifetime appointment. She is married to Chad Mizelle, who served as acting general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security under Trump, as well as associate counsel at the Trump White House.

Friday is Earth Day. Your viewers, readers and listeners care.

In this Sept. 27, 2020, file photo, an air tanker drops retardant on the Glass Fire burning in Calistoga, Calif. (AP Photo/Noah Berger, File)

When I was in college in the ’70s, Earth Day was a day when only the most socially aware people would talk about “saving the environment” and skeptics called them tree-huggers and extremists. Compare that to this recent quote:

“Climate change is the single greatest health threat to humanity,” said Jeffrey Duchin, a health officer for Seattle and King County. “And I’ve been preoccupied with Covid over the last two years.”

Remember this 1991 ad that ran in newspapers nationwide along with radio ads and targeted ads on talk radio?

(The Information Council for the Environment)

It came from the Information Council for the Environment, which was sponsored by coal companies and electric companies that used coal. The group aimed to convince people that climate change was merely a theory, not a scientific fact. It also claimed that proof that carbon dioxide was the primary cause of climate change was “nonexistent.”

Today, the Pew Research Center finds, “Most Americans say climate change affects their local community, including 70% living near coast.”

(Pew Research Center)

And, “67% of Americans perceive a rise in extreme weather, but partisans differ over government efforts to address it.”

Gallup polling asks Americans whether our collective understanding of the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated, underestimated or correct. The number of Americans who say it is exaggerated and the number who say it is understated are almost equal. But go back a decade and notice how those numbers have changed.


Gallup has been tracking American attitudes toward environmental issues for decades and one trend is clear: When the economy begins to waver, economic matters take center stage and environmental concerns move to the back burner.


We saw what happened this month when President Biden was faced with rising gasoline prices. He approved the summertime use of E-15 ethanol, which is associated with increased summer air pollution. The rule change will produce a 10-cent per gallon savings for parts of the country that have access to the higher ethanol fuel.

A CBS story opens this way:

If climate change were a disaster film, it would likely be accused of being too over-the-top: wildfires reducing entire towns to ashes, hurricanes swamping cities, droughts draining lakes and withering fields, and raging oceans redrawing the very maps of our coasts. And now, many cities and states are asking, who’s going to pay for all of this?

“This is real; we’re on the front line of climate change right here in Charleston,” said John Tecklenburg, the mayor of Charleston, South Carolina. The city’s been battered by an endless parade of floods due to sea level rise. Some desperate homeowners have resorted to raising their homes by several feet.

Charleston and more than two dozen cities, counties and states are suing ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips and other fossil fuel companies to cover the costs of climate change.

(CBS News)

Yale’s Program on Climate Change Communication recently published interactive maps and graphics that let you drill in on public opinion about climate change at a very local level in every state. This is the big picture:

(Yale Program on Climate Change Communication)

When the Yale project asks people what global warming means to them personally, it is interesting that most Americans say it will affect people in other places but do not yet see how it will affect them.

(Yale Program on Climate Change Communication)

Gallup recently asked Americans what the Biden administration should do to respond to climate change. By a wide margin, respondents said yes to incentives for installing solar and wind power and buying electric cars.  Americans told Gallup they support hiking fuel efficiency requirements for new vehicles and that the country should spend more federal dollars to install electric vehicle charging stations.


A few recent climate-related stories from the past week:

Other interesting angles:

One 2016 study examined the link between weather and crime in Baltimore. That study found, “Maximum daily temperature is the most important weather factor associated with violence and trauma in our study period and location.” That study even suggested that hospitals keep temperature increases in mind when they forecast staffing needs. Another study said, “We find that there is 1% increase in the assault rate for every degree increase in the maximum daily temperature.”

A study by the Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health, the Natural Resources Defense Council and Wisconsin Health Professional for Climate Action found that climate change and associated air pollution cost Americans $800 billion a year, counting premature deaths, medical costs, lost jobs and mental health harms.

Politico notes:

Some of these factors are more directly measurable than others, but even those are hard to quantify. For instance, hundreds of Americans died last summer from heat stroke causing cardiac arrest, brain damage and other organ failure. Still more died from drowning as they attempted to cool off. Emergency workers and hospital staff were stretched thin between the heat emergency and coronavirus cases.

These are the “cascading” impacts of climate change-related health issues, as Duchin and other public health experts refer to as the domino-like health and equity challenges springing up.

“Our health care system was already stressed from Covid-19, and then you have the added burden of a climate-induced weather event that adds additional stress both to our emergency medical services and to our health care delivery system,” he said. “We really need to pay more attention to bolstering the resilience of our health care system to deal with these multiple threats.”

A new Harris poll finds 84% of teenagers believe climate change left unchecked will trigger global political instability and render parts of the planet uninhabitable. The young people told pollsters that they believe companies and legislators aren’t doing enough.

We have come a long way from the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970. It was first proposed in 1969 by Wisconsin Sen. Gaylord Nelson, right around the time that the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland caught on fire.

In 1970, President Richard Nixon won a fight to establish the Environmental Protection Agency and then passed the Clean Air Act. The fight began against pollution and litter but, over time, journalists investigated the effect of environmental toxins and shrinking green spaces.

One year after the first Earth Day, 25% of Americans believed it to be important to protect the environment. Today, 43% percent of Americans worry “a great deal” about climate change, and another 22% worry “a fair amount” about it.

We’ll be back tomorrow with a new edition of Covering COVID-19. Are you subscribed? Sign up here to get it delivered right to your inbox.

Support high-integrity, independent journalism that serves democracy. Make a gift to Poynter today. The Poynter Institute is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, and your gift helps us make good journalism better.
Al Tompkins is one of America's most requested broadcast journalism and multimedia teachers and coaches. After nearly 30 years working as a reporter, photojournalist, producer,…
Al Tompkins

More News

Back to News