Today, Berlingske Tidende (one of three major Danish broadsheet newspapers) launched its “digital edition”: a souped-up PDF edition of the newspaper. According to a series of articles in Berlingske, a large number of Danish papers plan to launch digital-replica editions later this year. A number of editors and sales managers quoted in Berlingske state that the idea behind the digital edition is simply to give away less, and make readers pay for more. That seems sensible, but is the digital edition the right solution? Is it the right product?
The Berlingske digital edition is a PDF-like version of the printed paper with built-in navigation. Readers view the section covers or all pages on the left half of the page, and click the individual articles on the right, which show up in plain text. On a broadband connection, navigation is fluent. But something basic is still wrong, and the digital edition will never be a replacement for true Internet editions, in my view. First of all, it’s nothing more than a frozen paper edition. It lacks 24-hour updating, interactivity, etc. And as for the marketing boss from Kristeligt Dagblad who argues that digital editions are easier to navigate than “confusing” newspaper websites: well, someone ought to buy him a 15-minute session with usability expert Jakob Nielsen. Digital editions of newspapers may become a minor source of income, but they will never attract more readers than newspaper websites for one simple reason: It’s paper layout squeezed onto a computer screen.
Uncategorized
The Next Big Failure: Digital Editions?
Tags: E-Media Tidbits, WTSP
More News
Opinion | Another day, another press conference with President Donald Trump insulting a journalist
Trump goes after NBC's Peter Alexander for Qatari plane question during meeting with South African president
May 22, 2025
Opinion | How two major newspapers published a summer reading list with books that don’t exist
Of the 15 books in a list published by the Chicago Sun-Times and Philadelphia Inquirer, only five were real. The culprit? AI, of course.
May 21, 2025
Biden’s 2022 comment about having cancer is going viral again. Here’s what he actually meant.
Online posts are reviving a three-year-old clip to suggest a cover-up, but there’s no evidence Biden knew about his prostate cancer back then
May 21, 2025
Opinion | For CBS News, Wendy McMahon’s resignation marks more than just a leadership change
CBS is caught in the crosshairs of a Trump lawsuit, an FCC probe and a looming merger. And its top news executive just stepped down.
May 20, 2025
SCOTUSblog is now owned by a conservative news outlet. What does that mean for its future?
The Dispatch says it won’t change the trusted Supreme Court news site, positioning it as a centerpiece of its expanding judicial coverage
May 20, 2025