Alan Reiter in his weblog today critiques Sean Savage‘s 5 reasons why camera phones are a supremely significant media technology. Reiter makes an interesting point about photo phones and journalism, suggesting that they can be useful in getting images out of extremely dangerous situations.
Reiter writes: “In dangerous situations, the ability to immediately post a photo — whether you are in danger from the weather, a war, the police, etc. — can be critical to getting out the news. Take a photo of secret police brutality, send the photo to the web … and then you get killed. Suicide photographers. Sure I’m being melodramatic. But war photographers risk their lives every day. Ordinary citizens with camera phones will risk their lives to document brutality, criminal activity, etc. Indeed, I am waiting (though not eagerly) to read the first report of a citizen killed because he/she was taking an important photo — whether it would be of a bank robber, a political protest, a police action, etc.” He’s so right.
Uncategorized
‘Suicide Photographers’
Tags: E-Media Tidbits, WTSP
More News
AI is creeping into every space of our lives, experts caution
From viral shrimp messiahs to fake news popes, AI is warping how we see the world — and what we believe
May 7, 2025
Your guide to 2025’s journalism conference season
With ONA, NABJ and more industry acronyms we love
May 7, 2025
Opinion | Meet the new media covering the Donald Trump White House
The Trump administration has redefined press access, filling its pool with influencers, partisans and a few legacy names. Here's what that means.
May 7, 2025
Trump’s interactions with the press pool are ‘unprecedented’. History explains why.
The president is testing the foundations of press access laid over a century ago
May 7, 2025
RFK Jr. says DARPA is spraying chemtrails — with no evidence and no basis in fact
The white streaks behind planes are condensation trails made of ice, not chemicals sprayed by the Defense Department
May 7, 2025