A guide to anti-misinformation actions around the world

Editor's note: This article's section for Malaysia has been updated with the latest news.

Masato Kajimoto and Alexander Damiano Ricci contributed reporting to this story.

BRUSSELS — This week, a European Commission high level group published its final report on misinformation, drawing upon the input of experts from around the world who gathered over several weeks to help the European Union figure out what to do about fake news.

The report created by the high level group — announced in November to help the EU craft policies to address growing concern about misinformation in Europe — contains an inclusive, collaborative approach to addressing misinformation around the world (Disclosure: Poynter attended the meetings as one of the experts).

The report, while imperfect, explicitly recommends not regulating against misinformation — but the EU is only one of many governing bodies that have sought to stem the flow of online misinformation over the past few months.

Spanning from Brazil to South Korea, these efforts raise questions about infringing free speech guarantees and are frequently victims of uncertainty. The muddying of the definition of fake news, the relative reach of which is still being studied, hinders governments’ ability to accomplish anything effective.

In the spirit of this confusion, explained in detail in a recent Council of Europe report, Poynter has created a guide for existing attempts to legislate against what can broadly be referred to as online misinformation. While not every law contained here relates to fake news specifically, they’ve all often been wrapped into that broader discussion. We have attempted to label different interventions as clearly as possible.

Since these efforts seem to be announced weekly, this article will be updated on an ongoing basis. If you catch an error or know of an update in one of our summaries, email dfunke@poynter.org and we’ll update as soon as possible.

Brazil | Croatia | France | Germany | Indonesia | Ireland | Italy | Malaysia | The Philippines | Singapore | South Korea | Spain | Sweden | United Kingdom | United States


Action: Proposed government task force

Focus: Election-related misinformation

The Federal Police’s announcement of a task force to “identify and punish the authors of ‘fake news’” came in the form of a tweeted statement Jan. 9.

The move mainly targets fake news stories dealing with October’s presidential election and echoes French President Emmanuel Macron’s own effort to curtail electoral misinformation. Still vague, the group will be composed of law enforcement personnel and draw upon a 1983 censorship law to prevent fake news from being produced and curtail its reach once it’s published online. That could come up against a 2014 law that gives internet users strong freedom of expression protections.


Action: Draft bill

Focus: Hate speech and fake news*

Borrowing from similar efforts in Germany, the Croatian government announced in January that it's working on a law to halt the spread of hate speech and fake news on social media platforms.

The bill, which primarily takes aim at Facebook, endeavors to primarily educate citizens as opposed to sanctioning the spread of misinformation. While fact-checkers aren’t too sure about the specifics, experts say hate speech seems like a more natural area of regulation for lawmakers in Europe.

The draft bill is the product of a working group from the Central State Office for Digital Society, which concluded that hate speech, public incitement to violence and the spread of fake news should all be addressed in one law (only the first two are covered by the criminal code). The legislation is scheduled to be released by June.

*This law does not have enforceable mechanisms to combat fake news, as others have reported.


Action: Proposed law

Focus: Electoral misinformation and sponsored content

In early January, President Macron told journalists that he would be presenting a new law to fight the spread of fake news during elections.

The proposed law, which was ready for presentation in mid-February, will create new legislation to give authorities the power to remove fake content spread via social media and even block the sites that publish it, as well as enforce more financial transparency for sponsored content, up to five months before election periods. That builds upon an 1881 law that outlaws the dissemination of “false news.”

The law, a draft of which Le Monde procured in early March, contains three major provisions. First, the Superior Audiovisual Council, France’s media regulator, will be permitted to fight against “any attempt at destabilization” from TV stations controlled by foreign states — an indirect reference to Russian outlets such as RT. The body would have the power to suspend or revoke certain media from those outlets that are deemed to be false.

Second, platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube will be required to publish who has purchased sponsored content or campaign ads and for what price. That component takes a page from the United States’ Honest Ads legislation, which applies existing standards for TV and radio stations to social media. And finally, the law enables citizens to procure summary rules from judges on what is and isn’t fake news in order to stop its spread.

Before entering parliamentary debates at the end of April, the bill will be examined by the French Constitutional Council.


Actions: Hate speech law

Focus: Hate speech*

Having gone into effect Jan. 1, Germany’s law against hate speech on Facebook is perhaps the most realized — but often misunderstood — effort to quell potentially harmful content online.

The law, titled “Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz” (NetzDG), forces online platforms to remove “obviously illegal” posts within 24 hours or risk fines of up to €50 million. Aimed at social networks with more than 2 million members — such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter — the law was passed in June 2017 and gave platforms until the end of the year to prepare for the regulation.

The law’s implementation points to the Bundestag’s willingness to move against questionable online content, but its enforcement has been rocky. A satirical magazine called Titanic published a piece with insults and was banned from Twitter, and even the minister of justice — who helped author the NetzDG — had his tweets censored.

In early March, officials considered revising the law following criticism that too much content was being blocked. Among those revisions includes allowing users to get incorrectly deleted content restored, as well as pushing social media companies to set up independent bodies to review questionable posts.

*This law does not have enforceable mechanisms to combat fake news, as others have reported.


Actions: Government agency, arrests and site tracking

Focus: Misinformation

In January, President Joko Widodo appointed a head of the newly formed National Cyber and Encryption Agency to help intelligence agencies and law enforcement efforts combat online misinformation and hoaxes before nationwide regional polls this summer.

Reuters reported that the agency was hiring hundreds of people to “provide protection” to institutions online. While it’s still unclear what authority the body has, other agencies have arrested alleged perpetrators of online misinformation. The government has also been blocking websites that publish content deemed to be harmful for society.

The Jakarta Post reported that social media companies are also working with the government to block and remove fake content, as well as illegal media such as pornography. In late January, the government also deployed a tool that allegedly automatically tracks and reports sites publishing fake news.


Action: Bill

Focus: Political bots and advertising*

Lawmakers introduced a bill in early December that would make using a bot to create multiple fake accounts posing as different people spreading political messages a criminal offense.

According to the bill, using a bot to create 25 or more personas on social media would be punishable by up to five years in prison or fines of up to €10,000. The legislation also takes a page from the Honest Ads bill proposed in the U.S. Congress, eliciting widespread coverage as a law condemning all misinformation — an error in nuance that even Poynter made.

The ruling party, which opposes the bill, lost a vote in parliament in mid-December and it has moved on to the committee stage, where it’s unlikely to progress further.

*This law does not deal directly with fake news, as others have reported.


Action: Online reporting portal

Focus: Fake news

A little more than a month before the general election, the Italian government announced Jan. 18 that it had set up an online portal where citizens could report fake news to the police.

The service, which prompts users for their email addresses, a link to the fake news and any social media networks they saw it on, ferries reports to the Polizia Postale, a unit of the state police that investigates cyber crime. The department will fact-check them and — if laws were broken — pursue legal action. At the very least, the service will draw upon official sources to deny false or misleading information.

That plan came amid a national frenzy over fake news leading into the March 4 election and suffered from the same vagueness as the ones in Brazil, Croatia and France: a lacking definition of what constitutes “fake news.”


Action: Draft bill

Focus: Fake news

Both houses of the Malaysian government have passed a bill that outlaws fake news going into an August election, which will likely concentrate on corruption allegations against Prime Minister Najib Razak.

The bill would make publishing or sharing fake news punishable by up to six years in prison. Online service providers would be responsible for third-party content, foreign news outlets reporting on Malaysia could be affected and anyone could lodge a complaint against an alleged purveyor of misinformation. Representatives from social media companies like Facebook and Google met with lawmakers in Kuala Lumpur in mid-March to get their views on the law.

But the opposition argues the government’s definition of what constitutes fake news — “any news, information, data and reports which are wholly or partly false, whether in the form of features, visuals or audio recordings or in any other form capable of suggesting words or ideas” — is too vague and that the bill is an effort to stifle free speech ahead of the August election. Malaysia's head of state still needs to sign the bill into law, but that is expected to be a formality since he supports the bill anyway.

The Philippines

Action: Dismissed bill

Focus: Misinformation

In February, the chair of the Senate’s Committee on Public Information and Mass Media filed a bill that would hold government officials accountable for spreading false information.

However, the measure was challenged as unconstitutional, and President Rodrigo Duterte has said in the past that such a law would never pass. Duterte has used the term “fake news” as an epithet for media outlets he dislikes, and even has been accused of spreading misinformation himself.


Action: Parliamentary committee

Focus: Fake news

In January, Parliament voted to create a committee focused on addressing how best to address the problem of fake news online. Idea submissions from journalists, advocacy groups and others were made public in February.

South Korea

Actions: Government task force and proposed amendments

Focus: Misinformation

The National Assembly has more than a dozen pending amendments aimed at curbing the effect of misinformation online — about half of which call on platforms to self-regulate false content. One would criminalize the use of bots to manipulate online commenting.

At the same time, the ruling party has used a fake news countermeasure task force to file about 500 complaints against people allegedly publishing problematic content.


Action: Committee recommendation

Focus: Fake news

In early March, the National Security Commission of the Congress of Deputies passed a proposal asking the government to take action against fake news online.

In the non-binding recommendation, the committee requested that the government cooperate with the EU in developing strategies against misinformation. The proposal was voted down by the left-wing coalition.


Action: Proposed government authority

Focus: Foreign disinformation campaigns

Ahead of this fall’s general election, Prime Minister Stefan Löfven announced a new "psychological defense" authority in mid-January aimed at countering disinformation and foreign influence campaigns.

Building off both the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency and the parliamentary Defense Commission, the authority would “ensure that factual public information can be quickly and effectively communicated even under disruptive conditions, as well as identify, analyze and confront influencing operations.”

On the whole, Sweden’s proposed authority has a different flavor than those in other countries; rather than attempting to directly fight false or misleading information, it instead is aimed at promoting factual content. A start date for the body has not yet been set.

United Kingdom

Action: Proposed government unit

Focus: Foreign disinformation campaigns*

Among the most vague attempts to counter the spread of misinformation is the U.K. government’s decision to set up the National Security Communications Unit.

The unit, tasked with “combating disinformation by state actors and others,” comes amid an investigation of Russia’s reported use of fake social media accounts to spread misinformation about the Brexit referendum in summer 2016. While details are scant, The Conversation reported that the initiative echoes a Cold War-era tactic.

*This unit does not deal specifically with fake news, as others have reported.

United States

Actions: Proposed law and platform testimonies

Focus: Russian disinformation and political ads*

Confirmed by intelligence agencies, Russian meddling on social media during the 2016 U.S. presidential election has resulted in several piecemeal actions from the federal government.

First, Congress announced a bill in October that would require online platforms such as Facebook and Google to keep copies of ads, make them public and keep tabs on who is paying — and how much. Essentially, the legislation attempts to impose existing TV and radio ad regulations on social media companies.

Then, in November, representatives from Facebook, Twitter and Google testified to a Senate judiciary committee on their role in spreading disinformation during the election. During that meeting, there was broad consensus that Russia did manipulate their platforms, but the platforms projected an appearance of control when it comes to monitoring fake accounts and ad buyers.

*These efforts don’t directly address fake news, as others have reported.

Are we missing a proposed law or other action against online misinformation? Email dfunke@poynter.org and we’ll update the story accordingly.

Corrections: A previous version of this story stated that an Irish bill aimed at criminalizing the creation of multiple fake social media accounts to spread political messages was downvoted in parliament. In fact, the bill criminalizes the creation of multiple accounts only if they're made to look like different people, and the bill was downvoted by the ruling party but passed by a narrow margin to the committee stage.


Related News

Related Training

Email IconGroup 3Facebook IconLinkedIn IconsearchGroupTwitter IconGroup 2YouTube Icon