Slate
“Far from being useless pop entertainment, cable’s coverage of Anna Nicole Smith taught viewers reams about civil procedure, pharmacology, and police work,” says Jack Shafer. “I’ll admit that I learned a thing or two in the 30 minutes I watched.” He also notes that giving the audience what it wants shouldn’t automatically be considered a crime.
Uncategorized
No need for news orgs to apologize for Anna Nicole coverage
More News
IFCN announces new grant opportunity supported by Meta to combat AI-generated misinformation on WhatsApp
Grantees will have an opportunity to innovate with WhatsApp functionality
May 31, 2024
Opinion | Trump guilty on all counts: breaking down the media coverage of the historic trial
Despite the lack of cameras in the courtroom, the on-screen guilty counters and reports from the trial painted a vivid picture of a historic moment.
May 31, 2024
AP Stylebook updates entries on criminal justice, prefixes, and flips to Merriam-Webster
The new criminal justice chapter includes more than 50 entries covering specific terms, some new, some revised.
May 31, 2024
Poynter takes lead on AI ethics with audience research and summit
Poynter has partnered with the University of Minnesota to gauge news consumers’ view of artificial intelligence in the newsroom
May 31, 2024
Earth is round and high-altitude footage doesn’t prove Earth is flat
Humans have known this for more than 2,000 years, and since then, scientists have improved our understanding of the Earth’s shape
May 31, 2024